Pramod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46682 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Pramod Sahni Son of Late Yogendra Sahni R/O Vill.- Balaha Ghataro, P.S.- Lalganj, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jyotsna Rani Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Earlier the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 16.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61092 of 2023 with a liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail, thereafter, the petitioner surrendered before the Court below on 23.03.2024.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have hit the informant on his head with iron rod.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46682 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. The petitioner is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court and learned Court below. He also submits that charges have been framed against the petitioner on 27.03.2024. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 23.03.2024.

6. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

7. Considering the facts aforesaid and the custody of the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 83 of 2023.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T