Mantoriya Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55946 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2018 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Mantoriya Devi w/o Ram Vilash Sah, r/v-Banchauri, P.S.-Dumra, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in Dumra P.S. Case No. 210/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
It is alleged in the fardbeyan that informant got information that petitioner along with other accused persons namely, Bittu Kumar, Pappu Kumar and Rohit Kumar had caused murder of his brother-in-law Ram Vilash Sah, sister Sunita Devi and two Bhaginas namely, Bhola Sah and Rahul Kumar by sharp weapon due to family dispute.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that brother-in-law (Ram Vilash Sah) of the informant had land
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55946 of 2018(3) dt.27-11-2018 2/2 dispute with his first wife Mantoriya Devi and her sons. The case diary has been received wherein post-mortem report of all the deceased is available. The doctor has found death caused due to fire-arm.
Counsel for the State has submitted that in para 18 of the case diary, brother of the deceased has taken name of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Petitioner may renew her prayer for bail after nine months, if no substantial progress is made in the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) vinita/- U T