Patna High CourtCWJC/6148/2007dfd for non appearance

Baidyanath Mahto @ Baijnath Ma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-28Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6148 of 2007 ======================================================

1. Baidyanath Mahto @ Baijnath Mahto son of late Jagdeo Mahto

2. Ratan Mahto son of Late Bramhdeo Mahto

3. Musafir Mahto son of Mahadeo Mahto, all resident of villageSalempur, P.S. Lalganj, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Deputy Director (H.Qrs.) Consolidation, Bihar, Patna.

3. Deputy Director, Consolidation, Vaishali.

4. Saryug Mahto son of Gobardhan Mahto, resident of village- Salempur, P.S. Lalganj, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents either, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are printed in the daily cause list.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U