Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61420 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -328 Year- 2018 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar, S/o Surrendar Singh @ Suvindra Singh, Resident of VillageSarasat, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 328/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused is that they shot the informant's father by fire-arms causing head injury.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Co-accused has been granted bail by the lower court itself. Injury is simple in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61420 of 2018 (3) dt.30-10-2018 2/2 since 10.07.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Danapur, Patna in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 328/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T