Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49707/2024bail rejected

Jai Prakash Rai @ Chhuri v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-07Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49707 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2023 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Jai Prakash Rai @ Chhuri S/O kailash Rai R/O Village-Bajitpur,P.S.-Chapra Muffasil,Distt-Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Rajani Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 307, 353, 506, 332, 333/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, acting on an secret information that the petitioner and other accused persons had assembled near Bandh, police party reached there and on seeing the police party, petitioner and his associates tried to flee away. Police, anyhow apprehended the petitioner. Thereafter, associates of the petitioner started fighting and thrashing police personnel. Taking advantage of this situation, petitioner got freed and started fleeing and on chase, he made firing on the police party.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49707 of 2024(4) dt.07-02-2025 2/2 submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. He is in custody since 17.2.2024.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that petitioner and his associates attacked the police team and also made firing on the police men. Petitioner has got criminal antecedent including cases of Arms Act.

6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation and the fact that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T