← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1806/2023dismissed

Nagnarayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1806 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3856 of 2022 ====================================================== Nagnarayan Singh S/o Sri Ramchandra Singh, Resident of VillageNoormohuddinpur, P.O.- Punpun, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Dr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, The District Magistrate, Patna. 3.

Sri Amit Kumar, The District Education Officer, Patna. 4.

Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, The District Programme officer, (Establishment), Patna.

5.

Sri Sujata Kumari, Circle Officer, Punpun, Patna. 6.

Sri Mahesh Sharma, The Block Education Officer, Patna. 7.

Sri Abhiyant Sheikhar, The Panchyat Secretary-cum member Secretary, Panchayat Teacher Appointment Committee Gram Panchayat Raj Lakhan Pal, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna.

8.

Sri Anup Kumar Sinha, The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

9.

Sri Himjay Kumar, The Director Forensic Science Police Laboratry, Sardar Patel Bhawan Patna.

10.

Anil Kumar Son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of Village- Lodipur, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (Gp23) Ms.Meera Singh, AC to GP-23 For BSEB :

Ms.Surya Nilambari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-09-2024

1. It is apparent from the order dated 15.12.2022, passed in CWJC No.3856 of 2022, by this Court that no positive direction has been given to the opposite parties, however, the petitioner had been granted liberty to approach the respondent-authorities, hence it is for the petitioner to take up

Patna High Court MJC No.1806 of 2023(2) dt.20-09-2024 2/2 the matter with the opposite parties. Nonetheless, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna that the forged matriculation certificate of the private opposite party no.10, namely, Shri Anil Kumar has already been cancelled.

2. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the opposite parties, in case of any subsisting grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U