Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41705 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2017 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== DINESH KUMAR Son of Shiv Shankar Saw Resident of Village - Marara, P.S.- Roh, Distt - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in S.T. No. 416/2018, arising out of Roh P.S. Case No. 106/2017, instituted for offences under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 24.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42043/2018.

It is alleged in the written report that informant got information on his mobile phone from Devar of his sister that his sister had died. On getting such information, informant reached at the matrimonial house of his sister and learnt from the family members of petitioner that dead body of his sister has already been cremated on 19.10.2017. It is further alleged that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41705 of 2019(5) dt.14-08-2019 2/2 sister of informant was always tortured by petitioner and other family members for demand of Rs. 1 lac and one motorcycle. They have committed murder of his sister for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry although she was married just three years prior to the alleged occurrence.

Report from the court below regarding stage of trial has been received from which it appears that trial has sufficiently progressed.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail of petitioner is again rejected.

The trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order by fixing the case on day to day basis or by giving short adjournment and send compliance report. The petitioner is given liberty to renew prayer for bail in the event trial is not concluded within aforesaid period. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T