Ramjani And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.61266 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -221 Year- 2016 Thana -JOKIHAT District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Ramjani,
2. Thanku. both sons of Arif, Village Ghormara, Police Station Mahalgaon, Dist.- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jokihat (Mahalgaon) P.S.Case No.221 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 & 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assault to one another injured and not to the deceased.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injury on the person of the injured is simple in nature. So far allegation of assault on the deceased is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation. The petitioner is in custody for about four months and the another co-accused persons having similar allegation has been granted bail, vide order dated 19.4.2017
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61266 of 2017 (3) dt.12-01-2018 2/2 passed in Cr. Misc. No.18075 of 2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Jokihat (Mahalgaon) P.S.Case No.221 of 2016.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T