Ghanshyam Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ghanshyam Singh S/O Rambilan Singh R/O Village- Saidpur, P.S- Mansi, District - Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 dated 11.03.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 109, 303(2), 126(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the date of occurrence the informant's son, Arman Kumar, was allegedly attacked by Golu Kumar, Ghanshyam Singh (petitioner), and Prince Kumar near their house in Saidpur. The accused persons allegedly abused Arman and then Golu Kumar fired a shot on his head with an illegal weapon,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42988 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 which hit his left hand, while Ghanshyam Singh shot him at the thigh. Prince Kumar stole a gold disc worth Rs. 70,000/-, Rs. 10,000/- Cash and a mobile phone from Arman Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he fired at thigh of the son of the informant but the injury report of the son of the informant, namely, Arman Kumar does not support the prosecution case. The doctor has opined that injury no. 1 is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object and injury no. 1 has been mentioned as lacerated wound over the left thigh of size 6x2x2 cm. There is no injury of firearm on the thigh. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has one criminal case against him.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42988 of 2025(3) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-Ist Class, Khagaria, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S..
(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T