Jalalndhar Das @ Santosh Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62492 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Jalalndhar Das @ Santosh Das son of Malik Das, Resident of Village- Bihari (Tola Naya Janakpur), P.S. Madhwapur, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 296 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged in his fardbeyan that his Brother-in-Law Gautam Kumar was driver and was carrying Dalda on DCM Pick-Up Van to Siwan and in way some unknown persons killed him and looted the DCM Pick Up-Van loaded with Dalda.

Petitioner has confessed his crime and his role was to make arrangement of sell of looted articles and on his confession looted DCM Pick-up van and Dalda which was kept in his house was recovered. Petitioner has stated that he has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 30.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62492 of 2018(5) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 296 of 2018, if petitioner has no criminal antecedent subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall be present as directed by court and his absence on two consecutive dates in spite of direction of court, the Trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/ManojU T