Sujen Yadav @ Sajen Yadav @ Sujendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53400 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2021 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== SUJEN YADAV @ SAJEN YADAV @ SUJENDRA YADAV SON OF LATE LAXMI PRASAD YADAV @ LAXMI YADAV R/O VILLAGE- PAKILPAR, WARD NO.-03, P.S.- MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Verma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Murliganj P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021 was lodged on 2nd of February 2021 under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, the informant, Sanjiv Kumar gave a written application before the Murliganj, SHO alleging that the petitioner herein along with accused persons came near the Middle School and due to previous enmity started abusing them. Upon being opposed, it is alleged that co-accused Dipak Kumar assaulted his brother Chandan Kumar by axe causing injury on the head. Meanwhile co-accused Ravindra Yadav, gave iron rod blow to the informant's head causing injury to him. The further allegation against the accused persons is that they jointly assaulted both of them. It is lastly stated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53400 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 2/2 the FIR that the gold chain worth Rs. 60 thousand was snatched by Ravindra Yadav that led to the lodging of the First Information Report.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific allegations have been made attributing the role to Dipak Kumar & Ravindra Yadav, who caused injury on the head of his brother Chandan Kumar and the informant respectively. So far as this petitioner is concerned, it is submitted that there is an omnibus allegation against him and in view of the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and he is in jail since 1st of April 2021, (as stated in para-15 of the bail application), he deserves bail.

Taking into account the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -I, Madhepura in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021. (Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U T