Indal Rai @ Indal Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40001 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2018 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== INDAL RAI @ INDAL KUMAR RAY Son of Dipan Ray @ Dipan Rai Resident of Village - Raghopur Purvi, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2018 registered under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Vaishali at Hajipur.

Submission is that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, petitioner has not committed any offence. As a matter of fact, the deceased died due to sudden attack of loose motion and vomiting. She was taken to A.S. Nursing Home for treatment and from there she was being taken to P.M.C.H. for further treatment but in the way she died. After death information was also given to his father others.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40001 of 2019(3) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that there is allegation of demand of Rs. 50,000/- against the petitioner. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased and it was his duty to keep the deceased with full honour and dignity in which he failed and as such he does not deserve to be granted the privilege of Anticipatory Bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) K.K.RAO/- U T