Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53374/2021rejected

Narendra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-13Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53374 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2011 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== NARENDRA TIWARI SON OF KASHI NATH TIWARI R/O VILLAGECHAMANPURA, P.S.- BAIKUNTHPUR, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Baikunthpur P.S. Case No.124 of 2011 registered under Sections 364, 365, 366 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail by contending that the petitioner earlier moved this court for anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc.No.45286 of 2012 which was dismissed in default for non-compliance of order dated 17.12.2012. Thereafter the petitioner filed anticipatory bail petition vide Cr.Misc.No.20036 of 2014 which was also rejected

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53374 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 on 25.07.2014 by a Bench of this Court with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court below but the petitioner did not surrender and again moved this court for anticipatory bail. It is further submitted that there is no fresh ground for reconsideration of anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Having considered the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below within one week and seek regular bail. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T