Jago Yadav @ Gajo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42929 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar ====================================================== Jago Yadav @ Gajo Yadav S/o Late Hari Yadav Resident of Village- Madheli Bandh, P.S.- Kursela, Distt.- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate Mr. Indrajeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025 dated 19.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the instant matter relates to firing in between two groups due to rivalry for dominance and a land dispute, though the petitioner's name finds place in the FIR as being member of one of the groups but except this, any overt-act of the petitioner in alleged firing, has not been revealed. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42929 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 further submitted that in the alleged firing, committed by both the sides, no one from either side sustained any injury and in this regard, the FIR itself is evident. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 03.04.2025 and against him, the investigation has been completed and he is on bail in all the cases of his criminal antecedents.
4. Though, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but fairly accepted that as per the FIR, no one sustained injury in the alleged firing.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel and mainly the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged firing made by several persons belonging to both the groups and petitioner's specific role in the alleged firing has not been revealed and also, the completion of investigation against him, this Court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025.
(Shailendra Singh, J) maynaz/- U T