← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50894/2016bail granted

Jagarnath Manjhi @ Jagarnath Mabnjhi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50894 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -MOHAMMADPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Jagarnath Manjhi @ Jagarnath Mabnjhi, son of Singhasan Manjhi,

2. Rajanti Devi wife of Jagarnath Manjhi @ Jagarnath Mabnjhi,

3. Deepa Kumari daughter of Jagarnath Manjhi @ Jagarnath Mabnjhi,

4. Dipesh Kumar @ Dipesh Manjhi son of Jagarnath Manjhi @ Jagarnath Mabnjhi, All are resident of Village- Jamsari, P.S.- Uchakagaon, DistrictGopalganj, At present resident- Ajawinagar, P.S. Mohammadpur, DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Amrendra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B. Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 365, 366, 366(A) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the petitioners have kidnapped the daughter of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50894 of 2016 (2) dt.02-12-2016 2/2 present case. From perusal of Annexure-2 to the present application, it is evident that the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has admitted that out of her own will she has married with the petitioner No.4. Hence, no offence under Section 366A of the I.P.C. is made out against the petitioners.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. case No.23 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. No.541 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T