← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43207/2022bail rejected

Janak Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43207 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== JANAK CHAUDHARY S/O LATE CHATURBHUJ CHAUDHARY Resident of village- Bibiganj, Ward No- 7, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

As per the prosecution case, 15 liter of toddy has been recovered from the house of this petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way concerned with the alleged recovery. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43207 of 2022(2) dt.14-10-2022 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that from perusal of FIR as well as seizure list, it would appear that recovery has been made from the house of this petitioner.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T