Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54431/2017bail granted

Doctor Musahar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54431 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54431 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -450 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Doctor Musahar Son of Dhautal Musahar, R/o Village- Ramgarh Tola, P.S.- Natwar, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise Case No. 450 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation is of recovery of 5 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 08.09.2017 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54431 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge, cum Special Court, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Excise Case No. 450 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T