Bimlesh Rai @ Bimlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44094 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2026 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Bimlesh Rai @ Bimlesh Kumar S/o Munna Rai R/o Village- Jujharpur, P.S.- Gaurichak, District - Patna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishal Vikram Rana, Advocate Ms. Misha Bharti, Advocate Mr. Utkarksh Vikram Rana, Advocate Mr. Kumar Saurav Dev, Advocate Mr. Akash Priye, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 289 of 2026 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 25(1-B)a,26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

03. As per prosecution case, police apprehended the petitioner in connection with some firing incident. At the instance of the petitioner, recovery of two country made katta and two live cartridges were made from the house of co-accused cousin of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44094 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person or possession of the petitioner. From the FIR it is clear that the recovery has been made from the house of co-accused Ranjeet Rai. The recovered country made katta and the cartridges are not found compatible and cannot be used with each other. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case due to land dispute over ancestral land. The petitioner is having antecedent of two cases. The petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the submission of charge sheet and period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Patna City/concerned Court in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 289 of 2026, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44094 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T