Prayag Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46024 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Prayag Yadav S/o Dhundhu Das @ Dhundhu Yadav R/o Village- Garhi Bishanpur, PS- Lakhisarai, Distt- Lakhisarai 2.

Vansraj Yadav @ Bansraj Yadav @ Bansh Raj S/o Prayag Yadav R/o Village- Garhi Bishanpur, PS- Lakhisarai, Distt- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner No.1 is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 01.09.2025, a supplementary affidavit has been filed wherein it has specifically been pleaded that age of petitioner no.1 is 79 years. It is also submitted that petitioner no.1 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46024 of 2025(4) dt.08-09-2025 2/3 persons including the petitioner have blocked the passage of the informant's house by putting brick and when the informant objected, the accused persons including the petitioner surrounded him and assaulted, further Bikash Yadav assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on head. Thereafter Bansraj Yadav assaulted the informant's brother by an iron rod causing injury on head, thereafter Rikesh Yadav assaulted Pratima Devi and petitioner no.1 along with Bansraj assaulted Ranjit Yadav by means of Lathi. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case by the informant being Karta of the family. It is next submitted that in order to coerce the family members of the petitioner into submission, the instant case has been lodged by the informant against the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner no.1, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46024 of 2025(4) dt.08-09-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.13 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T