← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49753/2016disposed

Md. Safif @ Md. Sarif And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-17Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49753 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -362 Year- 2014 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Md. Safif @ Md. Sarif Son of Late Md. Ibrahim,

2. Noorjahan, W/o. Md. Safif

3. Khusbhoo Parween, D/O Md. Safif all permanent residents of villageVeermamal, P.S. Belsar, District- Vaishali at present residing at Sector-5, Sapna Nagar, P.S.- Gandhi Dham, District- Kutch, Gujrat. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Soni Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Victim Najni Khatoon, the daughter of the informant, was allegedly done to death for non-fulfilment of the dowry demand within three years of her marriage. The petitioners are inlaws of the victim. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that only family members have supported before the police regarding the allegation of illegal demand and torture; whereas some

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49753 of 2016 (3) dt.17-01-2017 2/2 independent witnesses, who are co-villagers have stated to the police that everything was O.K. and all of a sudden they heard a noise of unnatural death.

Petitioner Md. Safif @ Md. Sarif and petitioner Noorjahan are the parents of the husband of the deceased. Considering the nature of allegation against them, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Since petitioner Khushboo Parween is unmarried girl, She, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur/Successor Court in connection with Vaishali Police Station Case No.362 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T