Jai Kishore Mukhiya @ Guru @ Raj Kishore Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45605 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2024 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Jai Kishore Mukhiya @ Guru @ Raj Kishore Mukhiya S/o Pradeep Mukhiya Resident Of Village- Dhodhana Ward No 03, Ps- Dumra, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that two unidentified miscreants, riding on a motorcycle, intercepted the informant and on the point of pistol, robbed Rs. 74,183/- which was collected from different customers of Ujjivan Small Finance Bank, mobile phone and other bank documents from the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R..
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45605 of 2025(3) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation, on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused person. No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Except confessional statement, there is no direct or indirect evidence against this petitioner to show his complicity in the alleged occurrence.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner has got two criminal antecedents.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T