Naintara Khatoon @ Nauntara Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2463 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2020 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== NAINTARA KHATOON @ NAUNTARA KHATOON Wife of Tejir Miyan @ Tijar Miyan Resident of Ward No. 8, Laukariya, Pokhar Tola, Police Station - Bairiya, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prafull Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.299/2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 12 of POCSO Act.

As per the prosecution case, daughter of informant aged about 15 years was walking on road with her mother and Aunt

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2463 of 2021(2) dt.15-03-2021 2/2 when four persons covering their faces came from motorcycle and kidnapped his daughter for the purpose of marriage. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case without any material due to dirty village politics. Even in the FIR, the informant has not taken her name. He submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the kidnapping of the girl. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the application and has been languishing in custody since 03.07.2020.

Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.299/2020. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T