← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1036/2021dismissed

Indradev Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Education Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2025-09-01Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1036 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Indradev Prasad Yadav Son of Yaddu Yadav, Resident Of Village- Punadih, P.O.- Kajra, P.S.- Kajra, District- Lakhisarai, Presently Posted As Panchayat Teacher At Primary School, Kanimoh, Block- Suryagadha, DistrictLakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Education Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Education Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director, Munger Division, Education Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai.

6.

The District Program Officer, (Establishment), Education Deptt., DistrictLakhisarai. 7.

Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Teachers Recruitment Verification, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned SC-28 for the State is present.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking direction to the Respondent-State authorities for re-verification of the documents filed before them in regard to their education certificates of Class-Inter which has been found to be forged by the Respondent-State authorities and

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1036 of 2021(5) dt.01-09-2025 2/2 F.I.R. has been lodged.

3. In the aforesaid situation, the petitioner has remedy to file appropriate petition for quashing of the F.I.R. which has been based on so called forged education certificate of the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is not maintainable.

5. Hence, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take legal remedy as per law. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T