Abdul Jabbar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44191 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2020 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== ABDUL JABBAR S/o Late Israil R/o village- Mohammadpur, Sisawaniya, P.S.- Banjariya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Recovery is of total 16.875 liters of wine.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case on the ground that the petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle in question. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44191 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/3 the petitioner and petitioner has no concern at all with the alleged recovery or the motorcycle in question. He further submits that in fact the petitioner has already sold out the motorcycle to Md. Mojahir Alam son of Md. Haqim Ansari since long back in the year 2012 itself.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 612 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44191 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 3/3

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T