Mani Kant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53591 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2021 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== MANI KANT SINGH S/o LATE KUSHESHWAR SINGH R/o VILLAGE - BHELDI, P.S - BHELDI, DISTRICT - SARAN.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Anuj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceedings. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and has antecedent of three cases as stated in para 3 of the bail application.

The informant alleges that when the son of the informant refused to give extortion money to the petitioner, the petitioner assaulted him with knife on abdomen, neck and back,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53591 of 2021(2) dt.15-02-2022 2/2 further the injured was brought to the hospital from where he was referred to Patna for treatment and accordingly he was admitted in a private nursing home.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and the informant are Gotias and there was a fight between the petitioner and the son of the informant on some issue as a result of which the occurrence took place. It is further submitted that the FIR is completely silent with respect to the relationship between the informant and the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the bail application.

Permission is accorded with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charge. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn in connection with the aforesaid case pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T