Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44389 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-751 Year-2020 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Rajeev Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar S/o Shailendra Kumar R/o VillageBawanbigha, Ps. K. Hat, Dist. Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 176 of 2022 arising out of K. Hat P.S. Case No. 751 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 307, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case as emerging from the FIR is that the petitioner along with his associates brutally assaulted the son of the informant, due to which he died.
4. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had moved this Court earlier for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 3588 of 2022, which was rejected with an observation that if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44389 of 2023(2) dt.08-09-2023 2/3 petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. He further submits that since the trial has not been concluded in the stipulated time, the petitioner, vide present application, has renewed his prayer for bail.
5. In support of his petition, he has filed a copy of the order-sheet dated 20.06.2023, which shows that the trial is still going on.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that the trial has not yet been concluded, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, above named, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of concerned Court Below/Trial Court in connection with Sessions Case No. 176 of 2022 arising out of K. Hat P.S. Case No. 751 of 2020 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44389 of 2023(2) dt.08-09-2023 3/3 (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same. (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding the previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. Court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
7. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections. (Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T