Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43220/2019bail granted

Balendra Yadav @ Balindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43220 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2003 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Balendra Yadav @ Balindra Yadav Son of Late Hitlal Yadav, Resident of Village-Ganaura Tole-Koni, P.S.-Marauna, District-Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ugranath Mallik For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-10-2020 Heard Mr. Ugranath Mallick, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Atul Chandra, learned counsel for the State through Video Conferencing.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Lakhnour P.S. Case No. 250 of 2003 registered for offence punishable under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that 20 persons entered into the house of the informant, committed robbery and looted valuable ornaments. The name of the petitioner has transpired during investigation by way of confessional statement. The petitioner is in jail since 17.04.2018. Earlier he moved before this Court, but without success. Other two accused persons from whose possession recovery has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43220 of 2019(5) dt.20-10-2020 2/2 made, have been acquitted in G.R. No. 840 of 2003. Looking to the attending circumstances and also the period of custody, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Jhanjharpur (Madhubani) in connection with Lakhnour P.S. Case No.250 of 2003, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner would remain absent for two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T