Patna High CourtCR. MISC./120/2018bail granted

Abhay Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.120 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -111 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Abhay Singh, son of Ramesh Singh.

2. Sonu Singh, Son of Birendra Singh, Both Resident of Village- Duari, P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners, in the present case, are seeking regular bail in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No 111 of 2017 registered for offences alleged under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that double barrel gun which has been recovered from the house of the petitioner was virtually owned and possessed by his grandfather by virtue of license granted in his name. Annexure-2 has been brought on record to demonstrate this aspect of the matter, though the document is not complete. He further submits that after death

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.120 of 2018 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 of grandfather, gun in quention could not be deposited either in the registered arms house or in the concerned police station. Both the petitioners are cousin brothers and have been arrested in connection with this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that one more case being Karakat P.S. Case No. 109 of 2017 has been registered against the petitioners in which presently petitioner no. 1 has not been granted bail but petitioner no. 2 has been granted anticipatory bail.

Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No 111 of 2017 subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) sushma/- U T