Patna High CourtCWJC/1872/2016dismissed

Dinesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-25Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1872 of 2016 =========================================================== Dinesh Sharma Son of Late Shiv Pujan Thakur resident of Village- Repura, P.S.- Marhaura, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna,

4. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

6. The Additional Collector, Saran at Chapra.

7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Saran at Chapra.

8. The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.

9. The District Programme Officer (Est.) Saran at Chapra.

10. The Block Development Officer Block- Marhaura, District- Saran at Chapra.

11. The Block Educational and Extension Officer, Block- Marhaura, District- Saran at Chapra.

12. The Circle Officer Marhaura, District- Saran at Chapra.

13. The Head Master, Upgraded Middle School, Repura, P.S.-Marhaura DistrictSaran at Chapra.

14. Ram Sagar Sharma Son of Late Ram Nandan Sharma resident of VillageRepura, P.S.- Marhaura, District- Saran.

15. Umesh Sharma Son of Late Sheo Nandan Sharma resident of Village- Repura, P.S.- Marhaura, District- Saran.

16. Saraswati Devi wife of Late Satya Narayan Sharma resident of Village- Repura, P.S.- Marhaura, District- Saran.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate Fort the State :

Mr. N.K. Singh, G.P.26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-04-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The Court dismisses the writ application on the preliminary ground that it is the person directly affected by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1872 of 2016 dt.25-04-2016 2 / 2 decision so taken by the Circle Officer dated 17.08.2015 who is said to be the Head Master of the school who can make a grievance. Court will not entertain the writ application filed on behalf of the petitioner merely on his ground that his forefathers had donated the land, therefore, he has kind of emotional attachment with the issue. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 26.04.2016 Transmission Date