Patna High CourtMJC/3389/2015dismissed

Ashutosh Dwivedi v. The State Of Bihar Through Shri Amir Subhani Secretary Department Of Home Govt. Of Bihar Patna And

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3389 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17110 of 2013 ====================================================== Ashutosh Dwivedi, son of Late Jagesh Dwivedi, resident of Village + Post Office- Bariarawa, Police Station- Choutarawa, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Shri Amir Subhani Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar Patna .

2. Sri Lokesh Kumar Singh, the District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.

3. Shri Jai Chand Yadav, the Land Reforms Additional Collector, Bagaha, West Champaran.

4. Shri Animesh Prashar, the Sub-Divisional Officer Bagaha, West Champaran.

5. Shri Mahendra Prasad, the Circle Officer, Bagaha-1 West Champaran.

6. Shri Ram Bihari Mahato, the Circle Inspector, Bagaha-1, West Champaran.

7. Shri Hari Prasad S. the Suprintendent of Police, Bagaha, West Champaran.

8. Shri Krishna Nand Jha, the S.H.O., Choutarawa, Police Station, DistrictBagaha.

9. Saraswati Devi, Wife of Naresh Yadav.

10. Naresh Yadav, son of Rogi Yadav.

11. Vadu Yadav, son of Naresh Yadav.

12. Amarjeet Yadav son of Naresh Yadav.

13. Rama Yadav son of Naresh Yadav.

14. Lakshman Yadav son of Naresh Yadav. Opposite Parties no. 9 to 14 are resident of village + Post Office- Bariarawa, Police StationChoutarawa, District- West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Adv.

Patna High Court MJC No.3389 of 2015 (02) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 For the Respondents : Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State, I see no reason to continue with these proceedings. The land encroachment proceedings and the order passed therein by the D.C.L.R. having been reversed by the Commissioner, the same cannot be entertained.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Trivedi/- U