Md. Wakil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40525 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2020 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== MD. WAKIL S/O. MD SALIM Resident Of Village - Basudeopur P. S. -Barhara, District - Purnea (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Barhara P.S. Case No. 123 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, raid was conducted in connection with Barhara PS Case No. 122 of 2020 and petitioner was arrested with stolen motorcycle. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Motorcycle was not stolen rather belongs to his friend. Chargesheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2020.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40525 of 2020(2) dt.09-02-2021 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Purnea in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 123 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T