Rangu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40531 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2020 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== RANGU YADAV S/O. RAM SWAROOP YADAV Resident Of Village - Sumka, P. S. - Kasar, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kawakole P.S. Case No. 319 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Section 30(a)/41/52 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

50 litres of Mahua liquor has been recovered from motorcycle of the petitioner and petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner has got no concern with the seized liquor or the seized motorcycle. Petitioner is in custody since 21.09.2020 having clean antecedent, as stated in para 3 of the petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40531 of 2020(2) dt.09-02-2021 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 319 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T