Baban Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62541 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2017 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Baban Ram, Sono f Late Ram Kewal Ram
2. Nathun Ram, Son of Baban Ram @ Nand Lal Ram, Both are the Resident of Village-Balhma, P.S.-Daudnagar, District-Aurangbad Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners seek regular bail in Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 204 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C.
Petitioners are named in the F.I.R. There is allegation of causing death of the brother of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, as a matter of fact, younger brother of the informant entered inside the house of one co-accused, Jainandan Ram for causing theft in course of which altercation took place. Further submission is that another co-accdused, Jainandan Ram having similar allegation has been granted bail vide order dated 9.11.2017 passed in Cr.Misc. No.51341 of 2017. They are in custody since
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62541 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 6.09.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 204 of 2017, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(2) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (3) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U