Rohit Raj @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48241 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== ROHIT RAJ @ ROHIT KUMAR son of Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh Village- Bihat Tola Bhagwati Asthan Ward No-18, Ps- Barauni DistBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Avanish Kumar son of Ram Prakash Singh Village- Bihat Gurudaspur Pucca Tola Ward No-18, Ps- Barauni Dist- Begusarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms/Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner persuaded the complainant to provide him loan from the bank for opening a shop and got opened his bank account in the Indusland Bank in place of SBI and now petitioner is not closing the said account running in the name of the complainant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not an employee of the bank and even employees of the bank who are also accused in this case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48241 of 2023(3) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 have already been allowed anticipatory bail by this Court vide annexure 2 series. Petitioner has been made accused only on the ground that the loan amount was given by the bank to the complainant through the CSP of the petitioner. In paragraph 17 of the bail petition it is submitted that the Indusind bank has issued a loan closure report with respect to the account of the complainant. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st class Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 37C/2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T