Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53529 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2018 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

SANJAY YADAV S/O LATE RAM SHARAN YADAV R/o villageMeghiriya Tola, Lacchu Bigha, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad 2.

YOGENDRA YADAV S/O LATE RAM SHARAN YADAV R/o villageMeghiriya Tola, Lacchu Bigha, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

MADAN YADAV S/O LATE MAYA YADAV R/o village- Meghiriya Tola, Lacchu Bigha, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 87 of 2018 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 427, 452, 307, 380, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, when the complainant was at his door, all accused persons armed with various weapons came there and started to abuse. They also given

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53529 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 2/3 threatening to the complainant and fired from pistol and took away an amount of Rs. 10,000/- which was kept in a box. It is further alleged that the complainant has given Rs. 2,00,000/- to the accused but accused persons did not execute sale deed of land.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. The case is of civil nature and relates to the land dispute. Petitioners are own nephews of the complainant.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 87 of 2018, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53529 of 2021(2) dt.08-04-2022 3/3 section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U