The State Of Bihar And ORS v. M/S Sharma And Company
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.419 of 2012 IN Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 5418 of 2011 ===========================================================
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Sri Prataya Amrit, Principal Secretary, Department Of Road Construction, Bihar, Patna
3. Sri Baban Ram, Engineer - In- Chief, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna
4. Sri Narendra Prasad, Chief Engineer, South Bihar Wing, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna
5. Sri R.K. Yadav, Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Sheikhpura .... .... Opp. Parties/Petitioners
Versus
M/S Sharma & Company, Having Its Office Situated At Exhibition Road, Behind Abhishek Plaza R/O Ratnavali Vidya Mandir Lane, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town And District Patna, Through Its One Of The Partner - Sri Ashish Kumar Sharma, Son Of Sri Harish Chandra Sharma .... .... Petitioner/Opp. Party =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-08-2017 An interlocutory application, I.A. No. 6806 of 2014 has been filed explaining delay in filing the review application. The same is accepted and the delay is condoned.
In the present case, the only grievance has been raised by the petitioners that then name of Shri Pratyaya Amrit be deleted and be substituted by another name Shri Deo Narayan Prasad who was deputed on the post of Managing Director, Road Construction Department which has been resisted by the opposite parties who has
Patna High Court C. REV. No.419 of 2012 dt.16-08-2017 submitted that for certain period, he was also holding the post of Managing Director.
Be that as it may, as learned counsel for the petitioners submits that till today no claim has been made by the M/s Balkrishna Bhalotia Construction Pvt. Ltd., in that view of the matter, there is no need at present to review or modify the order. If any such situation occurs, the petitioners will be at liberty to approach this Court for modification of the order.
This review application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date18.08.2017 Transmission Date NA