← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7866/2014dismissed

Janardan Sahu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-05-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7866 of 2014 ====================================================== Janardan Sahu Son of Late Mohit Lal Sahu Resident of Village and P.O. Rampur Rout @ Routa, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga 4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Biraul, District - Darbhanga 5.

The Block Development Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan, P.O. P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga.

6.

The Circle Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan, P.O. P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga 7.

The Officer Incharge, Kusheshwar Asthan, P.O. P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Shyam Kishore Sharma, GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.

That the present writ petition is being preferred for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for commanding and directing the concerned authorities including the District Administration Darbhanga for removal of the encroachment from the land of Baba Kusheshwar Nath Mahadeo Jee and the further prayer relates for restraining the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7866 of 2014(4) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 illegal or unauthorized construction upon the said land in view of the finding recorded and the direction/order for removal of the encroachment in case no.23 of 2009 Shri Shri 108 Shri Baba Kusheshwar Nath Mahadeo Jee Vrs. Murari Lal and 14 others on 3rd April 2013 by the Presiding Officer Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Tribunal."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U