Anirudh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1887 of 2021 ====================================================== Anirudh Kumar, aged about 38 years, S/o Late Brahamdeo Prasad Resident of Village-Taraura, P.S. Daniyawa, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Health Department, Patna, Bihar.
2.
The Additional Secretary Cum D.G. Ayush, Health Department, Patna, Bihar.
3.
The Deputy Secretary, Health Department, Patna, Bihar. 4.
Principal Govt. Tibbi College and Hospital, Patna. Bihar. 5.
Durga Devi Wife of Late Brahmdev Prasad Resident of Village- Taraura, P.O. Pirbadhona, P.S. Daniyawa, District- Patna, Bihar ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Md. Shahnawaz Ali, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The admitted position is that the petitioner has been put back in service subject to the conditions which are evident from the counter affidavit, including payment of Rs. 5000/- per month to his mother, namely, Smt. Durga Devi.
In view thereof, the parties are in agreement that nothing remains in the writ petition and that it has become infructuous. This Court accepts such submission of the counsels representing the petitioner as well as State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the
Patna High Court CWJC No.1887 of 2021(8) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 issue was resolved amicably, the authorities may consider making payment of back wages for which he will be filing a representation before the competent Authority. With liberty to avail remedy by way of representation, application is disposed of.
Since respondent No.5 has not been noticed and is not appearing in these proceedings, this Court would observe that any decision on petitioner's claim should be taken after hearing respondent no.5.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U