M/S Anant Enterprises v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16257 of 2021 ====================================================== M/s Anant Enterprises having its office at Simili Murarpur behind J.C.B., P.S. - Didarganj, District - Patna, through its authorized representative - Prashant Kumar, aged about 41 years (Male), Son of Vinay Kumar, Resident of Karwan Ki Sarai Mal, Opposited Gandhi Arya Kanya School, Patna City, Nagla P.O. and P.S.- Malsalami District Patna Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Commercial Tax Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Director, Industries, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Director (Technical Development) Department of Industry, Government of Bihar.
6.
Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna. 7.
The General Manager, District Industries Centre, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Vikash Kumar ( Sc11 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 09-03-2022 After arguing at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty file a representation before the Director, Industries, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16257 of 2021(2) dt.09-03-2022 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court, reported in 2020(2) PLJR 321 (M/s Sunny Stars Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.).
The learned counsel for the State assures the Court that in case, such a representation is filed within a period of two weeks from today, it shall be duly considered by the concerned authority and a speaking order shall be passed within a period of four weeks thereof. The petitioner is satisfied with this, hence no further adjudication of the matter is necessary.
The writ petition stands disposed off.
(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/-Ajay/- U