Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59202/2017bail granted

Sri Ram Baitha And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-19Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59202 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1713 Year- 2016 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Sri Ram Baitha, Son of Jitu Baitha,

2. Bachi Devi, Wife of Jutu Baitha,

3. Jitu Baitha Son of Late Kari Baitha, All residents of Village- Gangali, P.S. Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.

4. Dinesh Baitha, Son of Jhingur Baitha.

5. Vibha Devi, Wife of Dinesh Baitha. Both residents of VillageRunnisaidpur, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

6. Gagandeo Baitha, Son of Ramjas Baitha,

7. Shankar Baitha, Son of Late Ram Ashish Baitha, Both resident of village- Sukhi, P.S. Belsand District- Stiamarhi. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Poonam Devi, wife of Suresh Baitha, R/o Village- Sukhi P.S. Belsand Distt.- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.C1-1713 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 427, 447, 323, 354B and 436 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is specific allegation against co-accused Nilesh Baitha of setting the residential house of the complainant on fire.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59202 of 2017 (3) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, namely above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Complaint Case No.C11713 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.H.