Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2022 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16468 of 2010 ======================================================

1. Kundan Kumar Son of Late Nathuni Sharma, resident of Hari Press Gandhi Maidan, Jahanabad Town, P.S. and District- Jahanabad, at Present C/o P.N. Pathak, House No. 412, Road No. 23 Nehru Nagar, Patiliputra Colony, Patna- 800013 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri A.K. Sinha, presently posted as Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri Balmurugan D, presently posted as District Magistrate, Gaya, Bihar 4.

Md.

Istyaque Ajmal, presently posted as Deputy Collector (Establishment) Gaya, Bihar

5. Sri Krityanand Niranjan, presently posted as Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sadar Gaya, Bihar

6. Sri Arjun Prasad Chandra, presently posted as Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sherghati, District- Gaya, Bihar

7. Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, Prakhand Vikash Padadhikari, BlockBelaganj, District- Gaya, Bihar

8. Sri Rajeev Kumar Verma, presently posted as Anchal Adhikari Imamganj, District- Gaya, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 In view of the order as contained in Memo No. 114 dated 29.01.2018 which is Annexure B to the show cause filed on behalf of O.P. No. 3, it is apparent that after the order of the learned writ Court a specific order has been passed whereunder the officer has been placed under suspension and a departmental proceeding is pending as on date.

Patna High Court MJC No.2022 of 2014 (7) dt.31-10-2018 2/2 So far as the grievance of the petitioner that during the suspension period his subsistence allowance has not been paid is concerned, the same cannot be taken care of in the contempt application. The petitioner will be at liberty to raise his grievance with respect to the non-payment of subsistence allowance during the ongoing departmental proceeding in an appropriate application and in an appropriate jurisdiction.

This contempt application cannot proceed, it is disposed off, accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.OJha/- U