← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42660/2025dismissed

Shivdatt Ravidas @ Shivdat Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42660 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== Shivdatt Ravidas @ Shivdat Ravidas Son of Vishnu Ravidas @ Vishnu Dev Ravidas Village- Rampur Ward No 5 P.s -Korha District -Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sarmendra Kumar Paswan, Advocate Mr. Amar Kumar, Advocate Ms. Deepshikha, Advocate Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1), 352, 351(20 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of assaulting and killing the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2025. He further submits that six witnesses have been examined and they have not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42660 of 2025(7) dt.24-03-2026 2/2 supported the prosecution case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the trial has started and the allegations levelled against the petitioner is of a serious nature; therefore, the petitioner does not deserve the bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of X vs State of Rajasthan & Anr, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3539, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T