Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62637/2017bail granted

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62637 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -224 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Mahto S/o Barahmdeo Mahto, R/o VillageMirpur Bhual, P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Town (Chapra) P.S. Case No.224 of 2017/ G.R. No3766/17 registered for the offence under Section 393 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It appears that later on his name transpires in course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Guddu Kumar. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, except confessional statement nothing has come against the petitioner. Though he has been made accused in two cases but he is on bail in both cases. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody for 6 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62637 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra, in Town (Chapra) P.S.Case No.224 of 2017 G.R.No.3766/17 subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U