← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39911/2020allowed

Vijay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-19Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39911 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== VIJAY RAI Son of - Raj Balli Ray Resident of Village- Hematpur, P.S.- Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.), District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no recovery of any incriminating articles/ motorcycle from the house of the petitioner. The said recovery is near the bank of river. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.09.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39911 of 2020(2) dt.19-02-2021 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIX, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur (Rustampur O.P) P.S. Case No. 63/2020, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T