Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48851/2024bail rejected

Barfi Manjhi @ Pramod Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-18Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48851 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Barfi Manjhi @ Pramod Paswan Son of Mahavir Manjhi Resident of VillGanesh Dumar, P.S.- Fulwariya, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rishi Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Fulwariya P.S. Case No. 188 of 2023 dated 02.06.2023, lodged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending before the Court of A.C.J.M.- XVI, Gopalganj.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons including the present petitioner against whom there is an allegation that they have assaulted the informant, his wife as well his daughters and thereafter, stolen gold chain and earring.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48851 of 2024(3) dt.18-09-2024 2/2 submits that petitioner is residing in a hostel and aged about 19 years and his career will be spoiled if, Court does not grants him anticipatory bail. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the present petitioner of assault by farsa on the head of the informant's wife due to which she was badly injured.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T