Ram Naresh Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.639 of 2016 (2) dt.05-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.639 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Ram Naresh Roy aged about 61 years Son of late Haribansh Roy Resident of C/o Engineer Arun kumar, House No.8 Nandan Puri, khajpuri ,Police station Rajiv Nagar, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, patna.
2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishveshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.
4. The Managing Director ,Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited , 7, Sardar Patel Marge, Birchand Patel Road, Area, Patna-8 000 15
5. The Secretary, Rural works Department , Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Patna.
6. The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural works Department , Vishwesharaiya Bhawan, Patna.
7. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.
8. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur.
9. The Senior Project Engineer, Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited , works Division , Muzaffarpur.
10. The Executive Engineer, Road Division, Road Construction Department Aurangabad.
11. The Block Development Officer Mohanapur Block ,Samastipur.
12. The Block Development Officer, Vidyapati Block ,Samastipur.
13. The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division Road, Construction Department, Gopalganj.
14. The Executive Engineer, National Highway Patna West Division Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupak Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. R.K. Priyadarshi- SC32 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 Learned counsel for the parties are present.
Mr. Rupak Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner informs that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and thus the writ petition has been rendered infructuous which is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash U