Brahamdeo Singh @ Brahmdeo Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55048 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2016 Thana -NARARI KALA KHURD DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Brahamdeo Singh @ Brahmdeo Singh S/o Late Chalitar Singh, Resident of Village-Beni Bigha, P.S.-Narari Kala Khurd, District-Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Pinky Devi W/o Brahamdeo Singh @ Brahmdeo Singh Resident of Village-Beni Bigha, P.S.-Narari Kala Khurd, District-Aurangabad .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-12-2016 Heard Sri Krishna Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Smt. Meena Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner, husband of the informant/Opp.Party no.2, has prayed for grant of bail in Narari Kala Khurd P.S. Case No.17/2016 registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. However, after going through the impugned order, it is evident that during investigation also the allegation against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55048 of 2016 (2) dt.22-12-2016 2/2 petitioner regarding second marriage has been found true. Accordingly, there is no reason to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T