← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49073/2024dismissed

Vishundeo Sah @ Kamaldeo Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49073 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2024 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vishundeo Sah @ Kamaldeo Sah Son of Ramashis Sah Resident of Bhadaur, Ward No.10, P.S.- Deodha, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

The Union of India, NDPS, Act The Union of India ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 38 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 20, 22 and 24 of the NDPS Act 1985.

3. As per allegation, on a secret information, the informant along with raiding team, raided the house of the petitioner and recovered 22.04 kg Ganja.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49073 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2 person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 10.04.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the huge quantity of ganja was recovered from the house of the petitioner. He has further submitted that the alleged contraband recovered is small than the commercial quantity.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the gravity of the allegation, I do not think it to be a fit case for bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T