← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42583/2025bail granted

Laddu Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42583 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- PARSAUNI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Laddu Ray Son of Bhikhari Ray village - Malkana, P.S. - Dumra, Dist. - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Randhir Rai son of Ram Sagar Rai Resident of Village- Hanuman Nagar, Ward no. 6, Ps- parsauni, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have kidnapped the minor sister of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42583 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. The victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS has said that she had eloped with the petitioner and got married to the petitioner and she is residing with him at Ludhiana.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special Judge (POCSO Act), Sitamarhi/ concerned Court in connection with Parsauni P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T