Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1127 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2143 of 2013 =========================================================== Sanjay Kumar Gupta, S/O Late Brahmdeo Prasad Gupta, Resident of VillageGopalpur, P.O. and P.S. Anchal Sahpur, District- Bhojpur .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Katihar

3. The Deputy Collector, Zila Establishment Department, Katihar

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar

5. The Superintendent Of Police, Jail, Katihar

6. The Jail Superintendent, Jail, Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sachhidanand Kishore Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Sinha, AC to GA-XII =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 22-09-2016 Delay in filing the memo of appeal is condoned. I.A. No.6493 of 2013 is, accordingly, disposed of. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. We have perused the order, which was under challenge before the learned Single Judge and are of the view that the order requires no interference. The learned Single Judge has noticed the controversy and dismissed the writ petition by order dated 01.02.2013, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2134 of 2013 (Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of Bihar and others). We are not persuaded to take a different

Patna High Court LPA No.1127 of 2013 dt.22-09-2016 2/2 view of the matter. This appeal is accordingly, dismissed. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/Rajesh AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 23.09.2016 Transmission Date